Why postgraduate management programs must avoid pen-paper based final exams
Dr. Kanish Debnath
Head of Research,
MYRA School of Business, India
Postgraduate management programs (PGP) are crafted to provide students with an extensive skill set that goes well beyond mere theoretical understanding. Unlike postgraduate programs in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), management courses must prioritize the cultivation of practical skills, the development of strategic thinking, and the refinement of leadership qualities, all of which are vital for thriving in the fast-paced business landscape of today. Conventional pen-and-paper final examinations frequently fall short in effectively gauging these essential capabilities. Nevertheless, the majority of business schools adhering to the University Grants Commission’s (UGC) academic framework still incorporate written final exams as a significant component of their curriculum. Even though the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 highlighted the importance of ongoing and routine assessments for courses, the distribution of course marks among various assessments remained flexible, permitting faculty at business schools to assign an unreasonably large weight to final exams that are predominantly pen-and-paper based.
An exceptional Master of Business Administration (MBA) or postgraduate diploma in management (PGDM) should emphasize practical applications, case analyses, and experiential learning in classrooms. The two-year PGDM program at the MYRA School of Business (MSB) adheres to a similar educational philosophy. MSB’s strong focus on advanced thinking skills equips graduates to confront intricate business issues, make sound decisions, and lead teams efficiently in diverse organizational environments. There are numerous other convincing arguments for why such programs ought to shift away from traditional examinations. Firstly, pen-and-paper assessments often lead students to engage in short-term memorization tactics, rather than fostering long-term understanding. Secondly, high-pressure written exams can create considerable anxiety, which may not accurately represent a student’s true grasp or capabilities. Thirdly, essential PGP skills such as leadership, teamwork, communication, and negotiation are most effectively showcased through interactive participation and practical implementation instead of through written answers. Finally, in our current digital era, professionals extensively utilize technology for analysis, presentations, and strategic decision-making, rendering pen-and-paper examinations outdated and out of touch with these modern realities.
Below are some alternative assessment methods to traditional pen-and-paper tests. I believe many of these can be implemented even outside the realm of management education. While these forms of assessment are neither groundbreaking nor revolutionary, they promote a well-rounded understanding and application of instructional content. A carefully curated blend of various assessment techniques is typically the optimal strategy to ensure a comprehensive evaluation of learners.
Comments
Post a Comment